In 1992, Francis Fukayama wrote about the end of history and the last man. His thesis was that liberal democracies and free market capitalism finally proved to be superior to other economic systems like communism and socialism. The background in which his essay was written, was the Fall of the Iron Curtain in 1989, after President Gorbashev had conducted a policy of Glasnost and Perestroika in the moribund communist Soviet Union. Francis Fukayama could be considered the ultimate counterpart of another famous intellectual, Karl Marx, born 200 years ago in the town of Trier.
Francis
Fukayama was not all wrong. In Europe, all countries have moved to some form of
liberal democracy and free market capitalism, although not all problems are
solved. China, which was originally a communist regime, has successfully
introduced capitalist principles, but doesn’t embrace democracy yet. In fact,
the current Chinese model is so successful, a Chinese man told me, that the people are anxious to embrace
democracy.
On the
other hand, Francis Fukayama could not be right either. One reason is cultural.
We live in an age of postmodernism. Therefore, if someone claims to have found
the ultimate economic and political system, he must be wrong.
Postmodernism, born from the disappointments of the 20th century, denies
any of us the right to proclaim a superior system. A pessimistic postmodernism resides
deeply in all intellectual thinking of our time. In a certain way,
postmodernism proved its correctness by noting the American capitalism, the
purest of all capitalist systems, has gone astray as well.
On the one hand, the
USA suffered a lot from the major financial crises in the economy. On the other
hand, now that its economy is slowly recovering, the country is paradoxically opting
for a more protectionist policy. But there is much more reason to be concerned
about capitalism. Capitalism often evolves in a direction of crony capitalism, with a lot of government involvement and with
similar tendencies towards corruption as in the comrade communism, which was so
well described in George Orwell’s Animal Farm. Capitalism also tends to graze all green pastures, leaving nothing but deserts behind. Capitalism is very bad
at protecting general interests like the environment. But this can also be said from communism.
It seems
like postmodernism may have some truth in it. All economic systems seem to
bite themselves in the tail after a while and for all economic systems, some form of ‘reset’ is required, usually preceded by social revolt. This is well
described in Tomas Sedlacek’s book the Economics of Good and Evil. Other essays about economy can be found by clicking the economy label below.
Picture: House where Karl Marx was born, exactly 200 years ago, in Trier, Germany.
1 comment:
Friends from Eastern Europe and the USA may be shocked if I seem to commemorate the birth of Karl Marx. I learned that West and East Europe have a different perception about the person Marx himself. In Eastern Europe, he has always been presented as a founding father of communism by the communist leaders, therefore he remains associated with the evil of the regime. In Western Europe, we rather consider him a lonely room scholar, whose ideas were worth discussing in left intellectual pubs, so that he inevitably got associated with communism. Whatever the perception is, the history remains important.
Post a Comment